After 30 Years, Solo Moves Practice From Barn to Big Law

Lawyer News

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney has added to its white-collar defense practice through the addition of a 40-year veteran with experience representing the likes of John E. du Pont and former congressman Edward M. Mezvinsky.


Tom Bergstrom was scheduled to start in the firm's Philadelphia office Tuesday after spending more than 30 years as a solo practitioner handling white-collar and straight criminal defense cases.


Bergstrom's wife, Dee, died last year and his four kids are either married or finishing up college. He said it was the right time for him to join a firm with a larger support network and work again in the city after spending the last few years in an office in a barn 75 yards away from his Malvern, Pa., home.


"You come to a point I think, and I'm there, where I need some support," Bergstrom said. "I mean support in the sense that, get younger people involved. There comes a time where you don't really want to do all the research that needs to be done and you have younger people interested in doing it."


Bergstrom began the process of looking for a new position about 10 months ago. He called William A. DeStefano, chairman of Buchanan Ingersoll's white-collar defense and investigations group, because DeStefano had worked at a firm Bergstrom was talking to. When Bergstrom asked DeStefano what he thought, DeStefano had a different idea and talks between Bergstrom and Buchanan Ingersoll began.


"I'm totally pleased to have Tom come here," DeStefano said. "He's widely recognized as, if not the top, certainly one of the top white-collar criminal defense lawyers in the whole area. To get somebody to come out of solo practice after all those years and join any firm, it's a huge feather in our cap."


Bergstrom will be bringing over a docket of cases with him to Buchanan Ingersoll, including a health care fraud investigation case and a case in Jackson, Miss., that is set to go to trial in the spring, he said. The bulk of Bergstrom's cases are in the Eastern and Middle Districts of Pennsylvania and New Jersey.


DeStefano said Bergstrom had to be selective in the cases he took in the last few years because of caring for his ill wife. He said he wouldn't be surprised if Bergstrom's practice "doubles or triples, really, really explodes," after joining a larger firm.


read more http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202474451213&After__Years_Solo_Moves_Practice_From_Barn_to_Big_Law

Related listings

  • The Law Firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Launches an Investigation

    The Law Firm of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Launches an Investigation

    Lawyer News 11/06/2010

    Levi & Korsinsky is investigating the Board of Directors of Fushi Copperweld, Inc. ("Fushi" or the "Company") (NasdaqGS: FSIN | PowerRating) for possible breaches of fiduciary duty and other violations of state law in connection with the receipt ...

  • Florida foreclosure law firm lays off hundreds

    Florida foreclosure law firm lays off hundreds

    Lawyer News 11/06/2010

    A Florida law firm once used by mortgage finance giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and now under investigation for its handling of foreclosure cases has laid off hundreds of employees, a lawyer for the firm's owner said on Thursday. The Florida attor...

  • Lovells, Hogan Managers Approve Law Firm Merger Plan

    Lovells, Hogan Managers Approve Law Firm Merger Plan

    Lawyer News 11/02/2010

    Officials at the Washington-based Hogan & Hartson law firm and London-based Lovells said Thursday that they are discussing a possible merger, a move that would make the combined entity one of the largest law firms in the world, with 2,500 lawyers...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.