Japan whistleblower sidelined despite court ruling
Daily Legal News
An employee at Japanese medical equipment maker Olympus said Wednesday
that his humiliating treatment has not changed despite a Supreme Court
ruling that his demotion for whistleblowing was illegal.
Masaharu Hamada said he is still isolated in the office and after last
month's court judgment is not given any work. His was the first
whistleblower case to reach Japan's highest court.
His lawyer Koichi Kozen said Hamada may have to file another lawsuit,
complaining of human rights violations. Japan remains behind Western
countries in penalizing companies that fail to abide by court rulings,
and some fines are so small companies would rather pay up than abide,
Kozen said.
"We would hope the company would respond quickly, but there has been
no response," Kozen said. "We want Mr. Hamada to get a new assignment,
where he can be happy."
Hamada, 51, an Olympus salesman with experience in the United States,
first sued in 2008, alleging punishment for relaying a supplier's
complaint.
He is considered a whistleblower in Japan because he raised questions
about colleagues' professional behavior and was subjected to bizarre
and humiliating punishment, such as taking rudimentary tests.
Related listings
-
FBI investigates missing $17M in trust funds
Daily Legal News 07/09/2012The FBI is investigating the apparent theft of $17 million from Northern California trust fund accounts.The San Jose Mercury News says the money has vanished from the trust funds of dozens of Santa Clara County residents who relied on a money manager...
-
Cal Supreme Court rules in child death case
Daily Legal News 07/06/2012Welfare officials can take children from parents who negligently cause the death of a son or daughter, such as failing to place them in a car seat, even if there was no criminal harm, the California Supreme Court ruled.The court ruled Thursday that a...
-
Wis. court won't rehear union case without justice
Daily Legal News 07/03/2012The state Supreme Court won't reconsider a lawsuit challenging Gov. Scott Walker's collective bargaining law without Justice Michael Gableman. Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne had argued Republicans violated the state's open meetings law d...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.