Supreme Court strikes down NO cameras


The Louisiana Supreme Court has upheld a judge's order invalidating traffic tickets issued through New Orleans' red-light and speed-enforcement camera system


The court's 6-0 vote on Wednesday could create a budget problem for the city, which collected $9.4 million from the tickets through August and expected another $5 million through the end of the year.


On Oct. 1, a state judge tossed out the tickets, saying the camera system violated a city charter provision giving the police department sole authority to enforce traffic regulations. The program had been administered by the Public Works Department.


The Times-Picayune reports an ordinance has been introduced before the city council to transfer the program's authority to police.


Related listings

  • NY appeals court denies bail in cannibalism case

    NY appeals court denies bail in cannibalism case

    01/17/2013

    A federal appeals court has denied bail for a New York City police officer charged with conspiring to rape, kill and eat women. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied bail for Gilberto Valle (VAL'-ee) on Tuesday. Attorney Edward Zas argued for ...

  • NY appeals court denies bail in cannibalism case

    NY appeals court denies bail in cannibalism case

    01/17/2013

    A federal appeals court has denied bail for a New York City police officer charged with conspiring to rape, kill and eat women. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied bail for Gilberto Valle (VAL'-ee) on Tuesday. Attorney Edward Zas argued for ...

  • Court: Judges cannot indefinitely delay appeals

    Court: Judges cannot indefinitely delay appeals

    01/10/2013

    The Supreme Court says federal judges cannot indefinitely delay a death row inmate's federal appeals to see if the convict can become mentally competent enough to help his lawyer. The high court unanimously ruled Tuesday against Arizona death row inm...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.